Answer extracted from the Up First from NPR podcast — listen to the full episode below.
Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro announced two deaths linked to measles in 2026, the first measles fatalities in Pennsylvania in 35 years. However, Shapiro disclosed extremely limited information about the deceased individuals, citing privacy concerns—a decision that has fueled online speculation about whether the deaths actually occurred or were truly caused by measles.
Governor Shapiro's announcement marked a significant public health milestone for Pennsylvania, yet the lack of detail surrounding the deaths raised immediate questions. The decision to withhold information about the deceased—including their ages, vaccination status, or clinical details—meant the public had only Shapiro's statement to rely on, with no corroborating details from health authorities or epidemiological data.
As Up First from NPR reported, this limited disclosure occurred at a moment when health policy debates were intensifying around vaccination, particularly following the appointment of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as Health Secretary. The measles deaths in Pennsylvania became part of a broader conversation about vaccine effectiveness and public health messaging.
The governor's invocation of privacy protections—standard in many health situations—created an unusual dynamic in this case. While privacy laws do govern the release of patient information, the combination of a major public health announcement with near-total secrecy about the victims invited conspiracy theories rather than public reassurance.
Skeptics online questioned whether the deaths had truly occurred, or whether measles was genuinely the cause of death, given the limited evidence presented in the public announcement. The lack of basic epidemiological context—such as whether the individuals were vaccinated or unvaccinated—meant public health officials could not mount a clear, fact-based response to these doubts.
Climate scientist Julia Cole studied coral skeletons in the Galapagos covering the past thousand years and found that modern El Niños are significantly stronger than pre-industrial ones, with climate change amplifying their effects.
During El Niño years, the southern half of the US usually experiences more intense rain that could cause destructive flooding, while the northern half gets less precipitation overall.
This El Niño will raise temperatures globally, and since it occurs on top of climate change when the planet is already about 2.5 degrees Fahrenheit hotter from burning fossil fuels, the compounded warming poses significant risks.