Beyond the Deck
The answer lives in this podcast

Answer extracted from the Beyond the Deck podcast — listen to the full episode below.

🎧 Listen to the episode on Listenly

How are data centers and AI demand shaping energy infrastructure planning in the GCC?

Data center energy demand is a major consideration for policymakers and investors because infrastructure takes years to plan and build, while technology can shift within 5–10 years. The solution is scenario planning: building a resilient national strategy that accounts for different demand futures rather than betting on a single outcome.

The Infrastructure Timing Problem

The core challenge is a fundamental mismatch in timescales. Software scales up and down almost instantly—you can deploy new compute capacity in days or weeks. But large energy infrastructure projects require 5–10 years from approval to operation, and during that window, AI adoption rates, data center efficiency, and technology architecture can all change dramatically.

This creates real risk for both governments and private investors. A country can commit to building a new power plant or expanding grid capacity, only to discover that demand evolved differently than expected, or that competing technologies made the original design less optimal. As discussed in the Beyond the Deck episode, this timing gap is one of the defining strategic questions facing GCC energy planners today.

Why Scenario Planning Works

Rather than predicting one future, scenario planning builds flexibility into the strategy itself. The approach maps out multiple plausible futures—conservative demand growth, moderate growth, and aggressive AI-driven growth—and designs infrastructure and policy that performs reasonably across all of them.

This method mitigates both risk and cost. By stress-testing plans against different scenarios, policymakers can identify which investments are robust regardless of how demand unfolds, and which contingencies matter most. As Carmen Hamze explains in the podcast, this balanced approach has become the standard thinking in GCC energy strategy—a shift from the siloed, single-solution mentality of the past.

"There's not one solution that's going to solve everything. It's multiple—green hydrogen will still be in place, LNG and CCUS will be key."

Carmen Hamze — Partner at Rollenberger. With over 14 years of experience in energy strategy and sustainability across the GCC, Hamze transitioned from biomedical research and healthcare consulting into energy consulting at a major GCC utility. Her expertise spans energy portfolio strategy, carbon capture, and balancing sustainability with energy security and affordability.

The data center boom is not separate from this broader energy mix—it's a new variable that demands the same scenario-based thinking. Listen to the full episode to hear how Carmen Hamze discusses the role of low-carbon molecules, renewable energy, and traditional oil and gas within a unified portfolio framework that accounts for data center demand.

See also

What are the key policy enablers driving energy sector success in the GCC?

The main enablers are attracting foreign direct investment, enabling private sector participation, and localization with import-export capabilities. Policy must create stable, transparent conditions for both domestic and international capital to flow into energy projects.

How did Russia's invasion of Ukraine impact energy policy thinking in the GCC?

Russia's invasion of Ukraine was an aha moment that brought policymakers back to realism—demonstrating that despite net zero ambitions, countries still need stable, diverse energy sources and cannot rely on a single ideology or technology.

What advantage do GCC countries have in developing CCUS technology compared to other regions?

Countries with a history of large hydrocarbon sectors like Saudi Arabia and the UAE have significant advantages in CCUS because they have existing upstream infrastructure, expertise, and regulatory frameworks already in place.

Key takeaways

Listen to the episode on Listenly