Answer extracted from the The Crexi Commercial Real Estate Podcast — listen to the full episode below.
Successful brokers shift from accepting nearly every potential client to turning down more deals than they accept. Gordon Lamphere processes two or three inquiries per day and ruthlessly filters for real opportunities—deals with closable buyers, realistic sellers, and creditworthy tenants with genuine business plans—spending just 15–20 minutes evaluating a prospect's website, credit history, and background to identify which deals merit pursuit.
Early career meant endless cold calls and no income—there was no option but to pursue every lead. As a broker builds a track record and reputation grows, the market dynamic reverses entirely. Instead of hunting for clients, brokers receive inbound inquiries daily. This abundance forces a hard choice: continue chasing every deal, or become disciplined about which opportunities actually fit.
Gordon Lamphere's practice illustrates this shift. To consistently execute more than 100 transactions annually across greater Chicagoland, quality control becomes essential. Deals must have genuine closing potential—not wishful thinking, not tire-kickers testing market rates. A prospect's creditworthiness, tenant quality, business fundamentals, and realistic timeline separate the deals worth pursuing from those destined to waste months and yield nothing.
Lamphere's method is concrete and fast. He spends 15–20 minutes evaluating each prospect—reviewing their website, business background, credit history, and current real estate holdings. This brief window is enough to distinguish signal from noise. Does the prospect have genuine financial capacity? Is their business stable? Are they serious about a timeline, or just exploring?
As Lamphere explains in the episode, most weeks he turns down more people than he accepts. That selectivity is not arrogance—it's efficiency. Pursuing marginal deals drains energy from real opportunities. The math is simple: if you close 100+ transactions per year, every hour spent on a dead-end prospect is an hour not spent advancing a genuine sale or lease.
"AI is programmed ultimately to keep you invested and not really seek the truth. So it's our job as brokers to understand that AI is a great tool and a great resource, but it's not God."
Gordon Lamphere — Vice President, Van Vlissingen & Co. Gordon is a fourth-generation real estate professional, licensed in Illinois and Wisconsin, with a Juris Doctor from Tulane University Law School. At Van Vlissingen & Co., the Midwest's oldest private commercial real estate firm, he advises owners, tenants, and investors across more than 100 transactions annually and hosts The Real Fines podcast, where he translates macroeconomic trends and capital market dynamics into practical intelligence for real estate decision-makers.
This filtering lens extends beyond simple metrics. The episode dives deeper into how brokers navigate complex negotiations, where legal expertise and human judgment remain irreplaceable, especially as AI tools become more embedded in deal analysis.
AI is ultimately programmed to keep users invested rather than seek objective truth. In one of Lamphere's deals, AI initially valued a property at a figure that proved dramatically inaccurate when challenged with real market data and human expertise.
Brokers and owners now demand higher expertise from lawyers because AI tools like ChatGPT and Claude can proof documents and handle routine legal tasks, but cannot replace strategic judgment and complex negotiation in high-stakes transactions.
Transaction speed has drastically increased due to digitalization and artificial intelligence. Clients now expect comprehensive market analysis generated in hours rather than weeks, fundamentally changing how brokers operate and compete.