Answer extracted from the Embracing Marketing Mistakes podcast — listen to the full episode below.
Senior PR directors and agency leaders involved in major public disasters—including the HIV blood scandal, maternity hospital scandals, the Horizon IT scandal, and Grenfell Tower fires—have never been held accountable by industry bodies like the PRCA or CIPR, despite their roles in these failures. If they did not know about serious issues, they should have; if they did know, they bore direct responsibility for not speaking up.
The central tension Robert Vincent Taylor raises is a question of institutional responsibility. Major scandals that harmed the public have touched PR professionals and their agencies, yet the industry's own regulatory bodies have not pursued accountability for those senior figures. This absence of consequence, he argues, reveals a fundamental weakness in how the PR industry polices itself.
As Taylor explained in the episode, the pattern runs consistently across multiple catastrophes. Whether the failure involved public health (blood scandals, maternity care), government digital infrastructure (Horizon IT), or housing safety (Grenfell Tower), the PR professionals at the heart of those organizations faced no disciplinary action from their peers or their industry bodies. The absence is striking because it suggests either that the PRCA and CIPR did not investigate, or that they investigated and chose not to act.
Taylor's argument hinges on a dual standard of responsibility. Ignorance cannot excuse a senior PR leader working within an organization facing a major crisis. If a director did not know about serious problems, they failed in their duty of diligence. If they did know, they bore an obligation to act or resign—not to protect the organization's reputation at any cost.
This distinction matters because it moves beyond the question of individual blame and into systemic culture. The PR industry, Taylor contends, has allowed a culture in which reputation management becomes synonymous with crisis concealment. In his broader remarks on the podcast, he points out that this culture is reinforced by the fact that major institutions can move past catastrophe without seeing their communications leadership face consequences, suggesting to the industry that the same pattern is acceptable.
"Honesty and integrity are on the wall but the industry does not have that. It's not the default position."
Robert Vincent Taylor — Public Governor at Airedale NHS Trust, Fellow of the CIPR and former president of the Chartered Institute of Journalists. With over 20 years of teaching PR experience and a career spanning from journalism through agency leadership at Burson Marsteller, Taylor has spent his professional life navigating the gap between industry ideals and industry practice. Now dedicating his work to voluntary positions with NHS trusts and charities following his diagnosis with stage four prostate cancer in May 2024, he speaks from decades of observation and direct experience.
The broader context for this criticism emerged from his PRCA Outstanding Achievement speech in November 2025, where Taylor used the platform to name systemic failures within the industry rather than offer the traditional gratitude speech. That choice itself signals the urgency with which he views the accountability question—a message reinforced by the over 800 comments his speech received, suggesting deep concern across the profession.
Instead of reflecting on 60 years in business, he chose to speak candidly because of his terminal diagnosis. He talked about racism in the industry and accountability failures among senior PR leaders.
One of his students doing an internship at South Yorkshire Police called him, worried because she had been asked to alter police statements for the media.
He describes the industry as sublimally racist, noting that graduates with Muslim-sounding names receive no responses to job applications, but when they change their names, they get callbacks.