Answer extracted from the Digital Construction Podcast — listen to the full episode below.
Technical professionals often drift back into their technical comfort zone rather than fully embracing leadership. Invest in professional development modules focused on understanding self, others, and managing relationships—because recognizing that people respond differently and require distinct approaches is what separates genuine leaders from technically skilled individual contributors.
For engineers transitioning into leadership roles, the pull back toward technical work is real and constant. It feels safer—it's the domain where you've built mastery and confidence. However, staying in that space means abandoning the broader leadership mandate that your role now demands. This retreat prevents you from developing the interpersonal and strategic skills that define authentic leaders.
As Devon Middleditch explains in the Digital Construction Podcast, the first critical step is recognizing that not everybody responds the same way to leadership approaches or communication styles. This insight alone separates those who manage people from those who truly lead them.
Middleditch recommends two specific categories of professional development: modules on understanding self and understanding others, paired with training on managing self and managing others. This four-pillar approach creates the self-awareness and interpersonal competency that allow technical professionals to function effectively as leaders.
Understanding self prevents you from unconsciously imposing your own working style on your team. Understanding others—their personalities, communication preferences, and decision-making approaches—means you can adapt your leadership approach to individuals rather than applying a one-size-fits-all model. This framework is discussed in detail in the episode, where Middleditch shares how recognizing different personas becomes a practical tool for preventing regression into technical work.
If you skip this development phase, you're likely to lean back into technical tasks whenever leadership becomes uncomfortable—and it will. This creates a leadership vacuum, undermines team development, and signals to your organization that you aren't fully committed to your new role.
The solution isn't to abandon your technical knowledge. It's to expand your scope intentionally. Middleditch elaborates further in the podcast on how scaling teams and managing organizational culture requires the exact discipline you're applying to your technical work, but channeled into people and systems rather than code and infrastructure.
Devon Middleditch — Head of Digital Engineering and Technology at Varys. With a career spanning Tier 1 engineering firms like AECOM and government agencies including Transport for New South Wales, Middleditch relocated from New Zealand to Australia early in his career and was instrumental in developing digital engineering frameworks on major infrastructure programs. He has scaled teams, shaped organizational culture, and pioneered the adoption of emerging technologies including drones, augmented reality, and common data environments in linear infrastructure projects.
There's another dimension worth exploring: how Middleditch structured the transition from technical work to operations during scaling periods. The full episode covers specific strategies he used to test team members' readiness for leadership roles before making permanent role changes.
On the Doha Expressway Program, Devon implemented drones to verify if digging was occurring on the ground for progress payments, and iPads with early augmented reality applications to enhance field collaboration and real-time data visualization.
Devon wrote a paper to executives outlining Engineering 2.0 and the need to scale computing technology in engineering delivery. Initially receiving no response, this strategic initiative eventually became the foundation for his leadership in digital transformation across major infrastructure programs.
Devon recommends a 70-30 ratio of full-time employees to contingent workforce. When you have a strong core of FTE staff, the culture is maintained. When the ratio shifts too far toward contingent workers, organizational culture can erode.