Answer extracted from the ConPulse - The Construction Podcast — listen to the full episode below.
How did Aurel and his team resolve a storm drain mainline design conflict?
The original design called for a storm drain mainline at a slope of 0.25% to 0.33%, but it would have collided with an electrical conduit bank. After potholes revealed the conflict was real and feasible, Aurel's team proposed three options and ultimately chose to move the mainline 10 feet south, add 45-degree pipe connectors, run it around the electrical infrastructure, and angle it back into the original line to bypass the obstruction.
The challenge began during the design phase when the team discovered that the existing electrical infrastructure occupied the same space as the planned storm drain route. This wasn't a theoretical problem—surface potholes confirmed the conflict was physically present, making a workaround essential rather than optional.
Rather than compromise the storm drain's functionality or attempt to relocate the electrical conduit (which would have been far more costly and complex), Aurel's team developed multiple solution approaches. The evaluation process considered the trade-offs between each option in terms of feasibility, cost, and constructability.
The chosen solution demonstrated practical problem-solving in construction engineering. Moving the line 10 feet south created enough clearance to avoid the electrical conduit entirely. The 45-degree connectors served as transition points, allowing the pipe to angle smoothly around the obstruction before returning to its original alignment downstream. This approach preserved the drainage system's performance while working within the constraints of existing site infrastructure, as detailed in Aurel's discussion of field problem-solving on the podcast.
"Don't do it for the money. The money will be there, believe me, because it's a difficult industry, but do it because you're passionate, but do most things in life because you're passionate and you will, your life will improve tremendously."
Aurel — Project Engineer, Granite. A civil engineering graduate from San Diego State University, Aurel worked as an estimator for concrete paving contractors and later as a project manager at a demolition contractor in San Diego before joining Granite, one of the region's largest general contractors. His approach to construction challenges reflects both technical precision and a commitment to finding practical solutions within complex constraints.
Interestingly, Aurel's background—including his early experience learning hard work on a landscaping crew—shaped his pragmatic approach to obstacles. The storm drain resolution illustrates a broader theme in the episode: construction success requires both technical knowledge and creative problem-solving when field conditions don't match design assumptions.
See also
What is the importance of clear communication with vendors and subcontractors on construction projects?
Aurel explained that having a good relationship with the foreman and trucks allows for precise material ordering. When the foreman needs materials, clear communication ensures timely delivery and project success.
What operational challenge did Aurel face regarding public safety on a construction project?
A retired gentleman regularly rode his bike through an active construction zone without a helmet, despite traffic control redirecting pedestrians to alternative routes.
What are the core values that Aurel values at Granite?
Granite has five core values, and Aurel particularly values safety, excellence, and inclusivity. He also values the team of hard workers that Granite has assembled.